Simple Citizen: Carbon Budgeting My Thanksgiving Weekend

After I parked the car last night, I checked the trip meter: 936km. Before leaving Vancouver last Friday for a family Thanksgiving in the Okanagan, I zeroed the meter. A couple of hikes, some salmon watching, two family dinners and a late night Monopoly “City” game later, we were back in Vancouver, all the richer for having spent quality time with family (lot’s of laughs). Our trip, like any other, did have a cost though, and I figured I should start keeping track of it.

After entering my vehicle year, make and model (a good condition, used, standard, four cyclinder, four door hatchback), carbonfootprint.com told me I had put .22 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere over the course of our return trip. That’s 220kg, or the equivalent of 5.5% of our annual household carbon budget for the year.

What the heck is a carbon budget?

Good question, it’s dead simple, but I’m only just learning how to manage it meaningfully. Let’s start with the bottomline: In order for the world to keep global warming below two degrees celsius, scientists say that annual per capita emissions of carbon dioxide need to be two tonnes or less. To put that into perspective, and to give you a sense of the challenge, the average North American has a carbon footprint of 20 tonnes, ten times what is equitable and sustainable. One long haul flight alone will easily eat-up more than half of your personal carbon budget for the year.

Clearly, we’ve got a long ways to go.

Transportation and utilities are probably two of the easier line items to keep track of, other sources of carbon dioxide, like the products we consume (electronics, clothing etc.) and the food we eat (How was it grown or raised? How far did it travel? Does it take a lot of fossil fuel to grow feed, e.g. corn for cows?), are a bit trickier to calculate, but online carbon calculators will make a “best guess” based on your purchasing habits. The rule of thumb is to eat local as much as you can, and to eat meat sparingly. When you can avoid buying new, used is the way to go.

Kicking some carbon ass (aka living simply)

Because this is the first time we’ve kept track of our personal carbon emissions, I have no idea how we’ll measure up (quite poorly I’m guessing). Our annual household (two-person) carbon budget is 4 tonnes (2 tonnes per person). If we were to include a recent flight to Ohio we took to visit family, as well as our other trips and consumption habits earlier in the year, I’m sure we’re already deeply in the red several times over.  However, because I finally remembered to zero the trip meter, I’m going to use the Thanksgiving weekend as the end and beginning of our carbon fiscal year. It seems fitting, given that this is the time of year we make a point of giving thanks for family and the food that sustains us. There's also something about the end of the harvest and the change of the seasons that makes it especially poignant. All of these things are intimately tied to the impacts of climate change.

With those impacts firmly in mind (pick any climate change news story), we’re not going to just measure for measuring’s sake. We want to see what kind of difference we can make. In recent months, we’ve made a real effort to grow more of our own vegetables with summer and winter gardens, and we’re getting close to a plastic-free “zero-waste” lifestyle (more on that soon). We’re also buying a lot more local food, and preserving it (canning and dehydration). Local and plastic free are at the top of our list when we go shopping. All of these things will help to reduce our CO2 emissions, saving room in our carbon budget for the things we really love, like surfing in Tofino, or having Thanksgiving in the Okanagan.

At the end of our new “fiscal year,” what I imagine we’ll find is that we’re still over our per capita carbon budget, but much less than we would have been otherwise. We’ll see areas where we can improve, and we’ll also see the limits of individual effort – those places where we need to come together as citizens to build things (through politics) like better transit systems, cleaner eletricity generation (and conservation), putting a price on carbon, and regulating industrial developments like the tar sands and saying “no” to proposed pipelines.

I strongly believe in a mix of personal low carbon social innovation and government regulation for achieving the two tonne average we’ll all need in short order to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. I also think the strong political call for regulation will only arrive when we all begin to think about issues in a bigger-than-self fashion. Rather than getting ahead as individuals, we’ll strive to get ahead together. Without simple (yet rich) lifestyles and a strong sense of community, I don’t see how we’ll achieve sustainability.

I’ll keep you abreast of our carbon reduction efforts throughout the 2011/2012 "fiscal year," and shortly after Thanksgiving, 2012, I’ll give you our annual report. I’d love to hear about your own efforts as well!

Steve Jobs Was The Leader Of A Religion, And We Should Be Concerned About What It Stands For

That a man with a wife and children dies young, is sad. That a brilliant (and by many accounts brutal) billionaire electronics product designer passes away, and is mourned as a saviour, is creepy. I’m genuinely sorry anytime a fellow human being leaves this earth, but I also think it’s important to analyze and critique what society’s apparent outpouring of grief over Steve Jobs' death says about us (sacred cows be damned).

I’m sorry folks, I’ve got a MacBook Pro and a second-hand iPod Shuffle, and they make a great deal of the time I spend on a computer, or at the gym, more enjoyable, but the way some people are reacting to Steve Jobs’ death creeps me out. I say that because he isn’t being mourned for the man he was, but rather for the brand he led as well as the ubiquitous electronics environment he designed and which we work (and apparently worship) in today. In my opinion, the world’s reaction to his death doesn’t say good things about where we’re at as a society.

In addition to the modified Apple logo featuring a silhouette of Steve Jobs as the bite taken out, as well as the countless Steve Jobs university commencement speeches shared on Facebook, there are quotes from other videos like this:

"To me marketing is about values. This is a very complicated world. It’s a very noisy world. And we’re not going to get a chance to get people to remember much about us. No company is…Now Apple, fortunately, is one of the half-a-dozen best brands in the whole world, right up there with Nike, Disney, Coke, Sony. It is one of the greats of the greats. Not just in this country but all around the globe.”

Indeed, Apple was one of the hallowed names of the corporate world when Jobs retook his position as CEO (after being pushed out years earlier in an internal power struggle). On his return, he had even bigger plans for the brand. Here he explains Apple’s “core value,” something that would set it above the rest:

“We believe that people with passion can change the world for the better…And that those people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones that actually do."

The Apple Religion

Steve Jobs was the leader of a religion – or at least as close to a religion as you can get in Western consumer society. There are the symbols, the strictures, the loin cloth (Levi's 501 blue jeans, black mock turtle neck and New Balance sneakers), the followers and the evangelists. There are the legends and stories of the leader’s selfless unshakeable commitment to “simplicity, ease of use and elegant design.” There was the famous “1984” ad, touted by Jobs himself as “probably the best ad ever made.”

Indeed many of the things Jobs did were described as “revolutionary.” In asking his followers to “Think Different” he directly invoked historical religious and cultural leaders (for example, Gandhi), building religiosity by associating the Apple brand with ideas and selfless acts of humanity far greater and more powerful than making computers for profit.

He said the company’s ad campaign was to “honour” those people who had actually changed the world. Some were living and some were not. “But the ones that aren’t, as you’ll see, you know if they ever used a computer it would have been a Mac.” Really? Would Gandhi have gotten behind a keyboard in celebration of the indentured servitude, farmland destruction and cancer-causing pollution Apple makes possible in China? I think differently.

How Has Apple And Its Followers Actually “Changed the World?”

As I attempted to convey in an earlier blog post on the serious cancer-causing and ecological consequences of iPhone production in Northern China, there’s a dark side to the Apple religion. There’s a reason Apple briefly became the most valuable company in the world earlier this year: They ship a lot of units. Tens and tens of millions, in fact. In the name of “elegant design” we’ll buy and throwout the latest generation of whatever we bought a year ago, completely oblivious to its ecological footprint.

A couple years back Apple did grudgingly make some improvements to the environmental-friendliness of some of its products, a response to Greenpeace’s “Green My Apple” campaign. Those changes however, are a drop in the bucket compared to the impacts of glorified planned obsolescence, the kind that is so engrossing that consumers will buy a product knowing full well another version with a camera or a wifi connection will be released six months later (“No problem, I’ll sell the old one on Craig’s list and buy the new one in time for Christmas). Now that's changing the world.

Why Not Try Thinking Differently, For Real?

One of the reasons I wrote this post is because it bothers me to see fellow “progressives” and “environmental advocates” mourning the loss (in the way that they are) of one of the world’s greatest CEOs, capitalists, and electronics manufacturing expansionists. Again, it’s sad to lose someone early, but it’s another thing to immortalize a corporate brand and its promise land of never ending beautiful electronics (read growth). Don't preach to me about the values of occupying Wall Street while you wax poetic about one of history's most successful and brutal capitalists.

Environmentalists have lots to say about flows of dirty oil and greenhouse gas pollution, but little to say about the flow of dirty electronics. The religion of Apple, as currently conceived, is diametrically opposed to sustainability. Unfortunately, environmentalists are some of the worst technology boosters I know.

Truly thinking differently in the sense of Gandhi, Martin Luther King or even Einstein (all three invoked by Apple’s advertising campaigns) means that your mouth shouldn’t be watering over the release of the next iwhatever, or at least if it does, you’re also mindful of the real ecological impacts of any given purchasing decision, and your true NEED for it. Frugality (make it delicious frugality) is how we need to start thinking, and living (drive that electronic device until the wheels fall off). Anything else is just the religion of mindless consumerism by any other name.

Dr. Strange Breath or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love Garlic

This weekend is Thanksgiving, and there's no better way to celebrate the gifts of the harvest, than by planting the gift that keeps on giving: garlic. I say "giving," because in addition to giving you pungent breath and all kinds of incredible medicinal benefits (cancer-fighting, antibacterial, blood pressure reducing), garlic is one of the tastiest and most productive plants you should have growing in your garden.

Garlic is also a relatively easy and forgiving plant to grow. It doesn't need much watering in Vancouver's wet environment. If you're a houseplant killer, garlic might be right for you.

According to Edible Vancouver, October is the perfect month to plant garlic in the Pacific Northwest, but you can plant anytime in the Fall, up until the first frost. When the cold weather comes, the cloves are ready to work their magic, multiplying from a single clove into 4,5,6 or more cloves over the course of the growing season, depending on the variety. In the spring/early summer hard neck varieties will grow a scape that can be cut-off and stir-fried or, and this is absolute luxury, pulverized with olive oil and served as pesto. Drool.

This is my first year growing garlic and I planted two varieties: Northern Quebec and Leningrad. Northern Quebec has nice large cloves, with pinky purple skin and it grows well in all conditions. It's described as "hot" and "vigorous" with good flavour. The other variety I planted is Leningrad, an early maturing variety that stores well with especially tight skin keeping the cloves tightly packed and protected. You can harvest this variety in July and enjoy eating it right through to the next spring - beats that Chinese soft neck stuff that gets mushy and starts growing as soon as you take your eyes off it.

Because garlic likes well-drained soil, and this is my first time planting in this garden space (generously donated by a fellow East Van resident), I wasn't confident about how the soil drained or retained moisture, so I built up two raised beds and turned them in with compost. Once I planted the garlic (six inches apart in all directions, though eight to nine inches is even better), I threw on some shredded Fall leaves to help with moisture retention and basic weed control (although I'll be watching these beds like a hawk). For real weed control you need a few inches of leaves...come to think of it, I better add some more next week. If all goes well, I should have 85 garlic plants growing in nice neat rows next summer, more garlic than we'll need all year!

If there was ever a plant sold by Ronco infomercials, it would be garlic - you can "set it and forget it." Actually you should fertilize in the spring with something like compost tea, and water periodically, but you get the picture. Put the garlic to bed and enjoy a second Thanksgiving come July.

P.S. Garlic Boundary Farm has an excellent page on planting, harvesting and curing garlic for storage.

Attack Ads Against Local Food Production Show the NPA and Suzanne Anton Are Unfit to Govern Vancouver

NPA attack ads against "back yard chickens" and "front yard wheat fields" may backfire as an increasing number of  Vancouverites embrace community gardening and urban agriculture. Every now and then a political party does something stupid that doesn't just make you want to vote against them, it actually makes you want to volunteer for the other guys, you know, knocking on doors, making phone calls, talking to friends. That act of stupidity has come early in this year's municipal election, and it was committed by the NPA and their mayoral candidate Suzanne Anton, in a recent radio ad that can only be interpreted as an attack against local food production and urban agriculture.

In the ad, a male narrator says city hall is missing "common sense," and the first two pieces of evidence he gives to support this claim are the existence of "backyard chickens" and "front yard wheat fields."

The attack ad is referring to Vancouver's food policy allowing residents to keep backyard hens and city support in the form of a $5000 grant for the lawns to loaves "collaborative city wheat farm," an initiative that aims to educate inner-city kids about "the history of grain and where their bread comes from." Vancouver Sun political writer Jeff Lee says lawns to loaves "actually makes sense" and he compares it to taking kids to the PNE to learn about agriculture and how their food is produced (e.g. milk from cows - I've actually heard stories about kids not understanding this). Clearly both initiatives make sense. In an age of rising food prices, peak oil and climate change, residents should have the right to bring the 100 mile diet as close to home as possible.

In an age of rising food prices, peak oil and climate change, residents should have the right to bring the 100 mile diet as close to home as possible.

As a friend recently pointed out, I shouldn't be surprised that the NPA has embraced the politics of division and ignorance, given that the firm they've recently hired to manage their election campaign, Campaign Research Inc., is the same firm behind the divisive election campaign of Toronto's conservative mayor, Rob Ford (famous for attacking bike lanes and “gravy trains”). They're also the same people behind Kitties4Christie.com, an astroturf website that attempted to derail Christy Clark's bid for the leadership of the BC Liberals by suggesting she was signing-up cats as new party members. Classy stuff!

The NPA's new attack ads rely on a politics of division and ignorance that appeals to the darkest side of voters, and I think that's why they'll fail, especially in community-minded Vancouver. Concern and interest in this city about urban greening and local food production has resulted in community gardens springing up on every patch of available land, long wait lists for community garden plots, and scores of volunteers for public space initiatives. People value the quality of life and renewed sense of community these initiatives help grow. The NPA and Suzanne Anton are directly attacking those values.

The NPA's new attack ads rely on a politics of division and ignorance that appeals to the darkest side of voters...that's why they'll fail.

If the NPA and Suzanne Anton were to focus group their new ads at the intersection of Penticton and Pender, where a bunch of neighbours and I have built a community garden, they'd be booed out of the neighbourhood, not by me, but by a bunch of sweet old ladies and gruff old men.

Since I started a boulevard garden this past summer I've had the opportunity to meet literally dozens of local community members from all walks of life. A good chunk of these people are seniors, many of whom rely on their backyard and front yard gardens to provide an important source of healthy food and an active lifestyle. In addition to hearing an earful about how to prune my tomatoes, I've also heard strong approval for the direction of city hall's food and community gardening policies, as well as a lament that those same policies didn't exist ten years ago during the reign of the NPA. One gentleman admiring my boulevard garden lamented that when he tried to plant one ten years ago, the city told him to plow it over. It wasn't allowed. Today, he said, it as too late for him, he was too old to plant one now. That made me sad and thankful for what we have in Vancouver today.

One gentleman admiring my boulevard garden lamented that when he tried to plant one ten years ago (during NPA rule), the city told him to plow it over. It wasn't allowed.

If you walk south from Pender on Penticton street you'll see yard after yard, fully cultivated, right out to the sidewalk, growing everything from chinese vegetables to onions and garlic, strawberries and currants, figs and cherries, potatoes, you name it. One gentleman has chickens in his front yard and young families delight in stopping in front of his house to watch them strut and peck.

...young families delight in stopping in front of his house to watch them [chickens] strut and peck.

In a city governed by the NPA and Suzanne Anton, what would happen to neighbourhoods like mine? Clearly the NPA doesn't value local food production or appreciate the necessity of it in a time of rising food prices, peak oil and climate change. They're out to lunch, and it isn't local food they're eating. For that simple reason they are unfit to govern Vancouver.

Time to vote for the other guys (and maybe knock on some doors too).

Build Soil. Build Community. (Part Two)

Andrew Manieri and Terry Schneider at Heartbeat Community Farm in Yellow Springs, Ohio, are doing the most important work in the world - they're learning how to grow food in a truly sustainable fashion. Along the way, they're building soil and community.

For a week in August, I had the pleasure of volunteering with Andrew and Terry at Heartbeat Community Farm in Yellowsprings, Ohio, a CSA that goes far beyond conventional organic agricultural practices. The beautiful picture above (taken by someone else, I just pulled it off Flickr) shows the incredibly productive no-till organic farming practiced at Heartbeat. In just six years, Andrew and Terry have built up the soil by at least six inches or more above the hard pack dirt, a reminder of the industrial farming carried out on the land in years past.

Heartbeat is like no other farm I've experienced. That's right, I said experienced (Jimi Hendrix style), because unlike the silent rows of genetically modified soybeans that surround this organic oasis, Heartbeat's fields are positively BURSTING with life. In addition to the farmers' own cries of joy celebrating the fruits of their labour, "Isn't that the most beautiful watermelon you've ever seen!!!??" the air is teaming with birds, Monarch butterflies and other insects drawn to the gardens' flowers, shrubs and trees.

With about 30 CSA members each paying a lump sum for a share of the season's produce, Andrew and Terry aren't getting "rich," but I can say with the utmost certainty that they are two of the wealthiest people I have ever met. These men are doing what they love every single day, healing the land, feeding their community, living close to the natural feedback loops of nature, and making a livelihood on their own terms.

Their money pile is their compost pile.

As I trimmed and cleaned garlic and onions, and helped dig potatoes and pick tomatoes and beans (among other tasty things - have you tried a fresh tomatillo?) Andrew and Terry shared their philosophy of farming with me, a philosophy based on a symbiotic, "non-empire," non-capitalistic relationship with the soil. They don't use machinery, their transportation is by bicycle, and they're doing all the work themselves. What that means is that they aren't trying to make a profit off the land or someone else's back - their capital is their own labour and the richness of the soil itself, which they defend vigorously. They half-joke, because it's true, that their money pile is their compost pile. They collect compost from local sources and amass it over the course of the year.

Andrew, who used to study philosophy at Oxford before abandoning "higher education" for farming, shared his strong belief that as soon as a profit or return on capital is sought in farming, then bad things start to happen for people (labourers) and the land itself (a rule that applies to almost all forms of profit taking). True freedom, he believes, can only be found in frugal living and self-sustainability. Anytime we try to "get ahead" in a conventional sense, then that's "empire," and the profit comes at someone else's expense.

What would you rather bank on these days? A rough and ready chestnut tree, or a newfangled mutual fund?

For all his anti-empire talk, Andrew still has Machiavellian tendencies, like his aggressive investment in chestnuts. This past year he milled an experimental run of 50lbs of chestnut flour, a delicious and nutritious staple that helped feed his family and that he shared with friends. Based on its success, he's planting more trees and eventually he hopes their bounty will become a significant part of his livelihood. The health of the trees will determine the health and happiness of his family and wider community. What would you rather bank on these days? A rough and ready chestnut tree, or a newfangled mutual fund?

Loam wasn't built in a day.

Before I left Yellow Springs, I bought a t-shirt from a local artist. His comedic style reminds me of Gary Larsen, with hilarious cartoons and captions like "Pink Freud" (a pink sketch of Freud the psychoanalyst) and "Much .edu about nothing" (frighteningly true at times). One that immediately grabbed my attention featured a picture of a plowed field with an angry Roman standing in it, waving his sword at an indifferent looking donkey. The caption reads, "Loam wasn't built in a day." I love it, and after my experience at Heartbeat Community Farm, I'm determined to build some loam of my own.

I need an iPhone 5 like I need a hole in the head, or cancer.

With Steve Jobs stepping down as the CEO of Apple on account of a neuroendocrine tumor in his pancreas, we should all take a hard look at the impending launch of the iPhone 5 and our cancer-causing, environment-trashing, socially destructive electronics habit (do they have an app for that?).

I myself don't have cancer (that I know of, knock on wood), but my family, like most others, has had major and life-changing brushes with the disease, and I've personally had close calls with melanoma in the past. Like everyone else, I'm worried about cancer. That's why I'm so frustrated with the glaring blind spot in public discourse about Steve Jobs' battle with cancer and its symbolic connection to his leadership of the world's most financially successful manufacturer and retailer of highly-toxic personal electronics. Most media coverage of Jobs' resignation is focused on questions about the future success of Apple and in the short-term, the launch of the new iPhone 5, the latest lineage of a now seasonal product line that epitomizes our society's toxic electronics consumption.

In case you didn't know, the iPhone in your pocket, and any older versions gathering dust in your e-waste bin, contain rare earth metals, 95% of which are mined in China, with lax regulations and no protection for workers. The processing of rare earth metals releases thorium, a radioactive byproduct that has been found in soil concentrations 36 times higher than normal in farm land adjacent to rare earth refineries. The China Post has a harrowing article detailing high rates of cancer, farmland pollution and other human health impacts near Baotou city in Inner Mongolia, home to the world's largest deposits of rare earth metals:

"Farmers living near the 10-square-kilometer expanse in northern China say they have lost teeth and their hair has turned white while tests show the soil and water contain high levels of cancer-causing radioactive materials.

'We are victims. The tailings dam has contaminated us,' Wang [a local farmer], 60, told AFP at his home near Baotou city..."

There are other reasons to be concerned about the social and environmental impacts of iPhones and similarly frivolous gadgetry. The UK's Guardian newspaper has a good article here. And it's not just the rare earth miners, refiners, local residents and farmers who suffer from our Apple addiction. In recent years, Chinese newspapers have begun investigative reporting into the working conditions inside Apple's manufacturer contractor factories, places that some have labelled "hell factories." Foxconn, one of Apple's largest contractors experienced a rash of suicides last year that prompted a Chinese Liberal newspaper to sneak one of its own reporters into the factory, posing as a worker:

"During his 28 days of investigation, Liu Zhi Yi was shocked to discover how the factory workers live in a sort of indentured servitude. They work all day long, stopping only to quickly eat or to sleep. They repeat the same routine again and again except on public holidays. Liu surmised that for many workers, the only escape from this cycle was to end their life."

I could go on about how the "hell factories" are also powered by the world's dirtiest coal but that would be a moot point relative to the account above. Hopefully the takeaway message and question is clear: Do you really need a new iPhone (or a myriad of other electronic devices for that matter?)? Now that you know the impacts of an iPhone, is purchasing one consistent with your personal or organizational values? Sincerely ask yourself that question the next time you find yourself near an Apple store or similar electronics retailer. Every phone upgrade, every new gadget we purchase (iPads 1 & 2, flat-screen TVs, you name it) has environmental and social impacts that will live on long after we die, and that we can't absolve ourselves from. We need to embrace a mindful frugality when it comes to purchasing electronics.

Steve Jobs' fight with cancer is tragic, and it should serve as a powerful reminder of the carcinogens we are pumping into our environment every single day, increasing the chances that anyone of us could develop some form of cancer, especially when we make it a habit to change our phone every year or two.

Personal pet peeve: While electronic communication has a role to play in building an ecological revolution, I can't help but feel that environmentalists are some of the worst offenders in touting new gadgets. If you're a person ostensibly working for the protection of the environment and human health, you shouldn't be a tech booster. Be the change you want to see in the world! Make sure your phone is produced as sustainably as possible, if it ain't broke don't fix it (or buy a new one), and when it finally does die, make sure it's recycled responsibly.

"Beyond Organic" Farming in Yellow Springs, Ohio (Part One)

I just got back from a beautiful (and borderline sunstroke-inducing) bike ride to Orion Organics, an organic farm located just outside Yellow Springs, Ohio, at 400 North Enon road. For a full account of the farm and the inspiring vision of its owners, the Yellow Springs News has a great article here and a more recent piece on some of the tough little CSAs springing up around town. The trip out to the farm was a powerful reminder of why sustainable, ethical agriculture (certified or otherwise) is so important. While the soybean and corn fields that dominate the land have a pastoral beauty to them, they're not so pretty when considered up-close.

Each field is branded with a sign next to it, identifying the GMO company that sold the seed, and the patented variety being grown. These signs reminded me of Percy Schmeiser's battle with Monsanto over transgenic contamination of his fields and seemed out of place on roads that only see a handful of cars everyday (what's their purpose?).

Then there's the purpose of the fields themselves - mainly to supply calories and protein for factory farming and unhealthy food products: Corn for cows that can't digest it properly and high-fructose corn syrup for humans who can't digest it well either. Soybeans for pigs and chickens crammed into confinement operations with cement floors and fouled air. I biked past one of these operations on my way to the farm and the smell made me sick to my stomach, a stark contrast to the fresh air and monarch butterflies at Orion Organics.

Spotting an oasis of trees and natural vegetation, I turned-in and coasted down a long driveway to discover a large hay bale house nearing completion and a giant hay bale greenhouse behind an older barn. Inside the barn I found Jonathan, the farm manager at Orion Organics. Jonathan was busy trying to find a charitable home for a couple hundred pounds of tomatoes that would soon spoil in the hot Ohio air (his cold storage was out of commission). "I hate wasting food," he said.

In addition to being super friendly and inviting me to tour the farm, Jonathan told me about his own economic rationale for learning to farm and that while he had thought about going back to school to get a masters in teaching (he's in his early 30's), he thought farming was a surer bet, providing a more physical, higher quality of life and the greatest sense of security one can have in uncertain times: being able to feed oneself. This sense of freedom and security was echoed by Andrew and Terry at Heartbeat Community Farm, (another farm I visited - more on that experience in Part Two), and I'm sure it was felt by the other local young people I found picking beans in the lower fields.

After admiring the farm's bean, tomato, zucchini, watermelon and popcorn crops, as well as their neat and tidy herb garden, I biked back to the Vale , a beautiful intentional community where we've been staying with my girlfriend's family. On the way back I passed through more of the same soybean and cornfields with large, plain farm houses spaced out every few miles. I reflected on how every aspect of these conventional operations is dependent on cheap, plentiful oil (chemicals, fertilizers, heavy machinery to plant, till, harvest as well as industrial driers to dry the crops, not to mention transportation).

Biking amidst a giant sea of conventional crops and baking in the hot sun among lonely farm houses (I was also out of water), I felt vulnerable and fragile, but not as fragile, I thought, as the giant monoculture crops that will someday be an impossibility in their present scale and form (not unless we find fertilizer and fuel substitutes that aren't derived from fossil fuels). I was also cheered by the fact that I was heading back to Yellow Springs - a small, strong community with a significant movement afoot to grow food locally and sustainably.

Viewed as an oddity in otherwise conservative, white bread south Western Ohio, Yellow Springs and other like-minded communities are doing the heavy and fulfilling work of moving towards more sustainable local food systems, and that's tasty stuff!

Why Polar Bears Suck

Put away your polar bear costumes and your "I Heart Glaciers" t-shirts. If your goal is to persuasively communicate the risks of climate change to the public, then you're barking up the wrong affective (emotionally resonant) imagery.

Research by Leiserowitz has shown that associations to melting glaciers and ice are the most salient images of global warming among the American public (and it’s not much of a stretch to believe the Canadian experience is similar). The result of this association, and similarly distant image associations, is that Americans “...perceive climate change as a moderate risk, but think the impacts will mostly affect people and places that are geographically distant (emphasis mine)...most Americans lack vivid, concrete, and personally relevant affective images of climate change.” (Leiserowitz, 2007, p. 50)

Shooting Ourselves in the Foot

Based on these findings, it would seem that scientists, environmentalists and climate change advocates are effectively shooting themselves in the foot every time they use images of melting ice and polar regions to persuade audiences about the risks of climate change. It’s a bad habit that many are unaware of: “If I was doing a Canadian presentation there'd be a whole lot more on permafrost melting and polar bears than maybe somewhere else, because that's something that Canadians identify with” (Recent personal interview with a Canadian presenter of An Inconvenient Truth). Yes, Canadian audiences might vaguely identify with melting ice and polar bears, but are they personally relevant? Four fifths of the Canadian population lives within 150 kilometers of the US border - thousands of kilometers away from the Arctic.

An Arctic Conspiracy

Perversely, efforts that build notions of Canadian identity around the Arctic may have the effect of focusing Canadian attention on climate impacts in an area that is part of our national identity, but that is geographically too faraway to be personally relevant. This might explain a seeming contradiction between the Canadian Conservative government’s focus on building-up the Arctic through visits and photo-ops as part of the Canadian identity, while simultaneously undermining efforts to combat climate change both in terms of international agreements on greenhouse gas reductions, as well as supporting expansion of carbon-intensive projects at home, like the oil sands - things that will have long-term negative impacts on the people and animals that actually live in the Arctic.

While they're awfully cute, when it comes to communicating climate change persuasively, polar bears (and their melting Arctic backdrop) suck.

Media Summary: The Dene Nation Joins Opposition Against the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-politics/dene-chiefs-oppose-northern-gateway-pipeline/article2105198/

"With over 100 pipeline spills and accidents recorded in Canada over the past two years there is only one thing to say about pipelines: They will spill."

- Dene National Chief, Bill Erasmus.

Dene chiefs oppose Northern Gateway pipeline The Canadian Press, Globe and Mail, CTV.ca, Winnipeg Free Press, Brandon Sun, Oilweek Magazine, mysask.com July 21, 2011 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-politics/dene-chiefs-oppose-northern-gateway-pipeline/article2105198/

Dene Nation Joins Pipeline Opponents: Chiefs say Enbridge pipeline too dangerous CFTK-TV Terrace and CJFW Radio July 21, 2011 http://www.cftktv.com/News/Story.aspx?ID=1461003 "Let's launch a broad public debate on the future of the oilsands before it is too late to turn back." Paul Hanley The StarPhoenix July 26, 2011 http://www.thestarphoenix.com/business/Oilsands+development+moves+forward/5158300/story.html

Oil Sands: The Dene Nation Announces Support of BC First Nations Opposition to Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline

Opposition gains powerful new ally in Dene Nation; resolution supports right of decision-making power over development on First Nations land.

YELLOWKNIFE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES--(Marketwire - July 21, 2011) - A Correction is issued with respect to the release issued earlier today at 9:00 AM ET. In the first paragraph, "Yinka Deneerent" has been changed to "Yinka Dene", and the corrected release follows.

First Nations opposition to the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline has gained a powerful new ally in the Dene Nation. The thirty-five Chiefs of Denendeh, stretching from northern Alberta through the entire Northwest Territories, passed a resolution supporting British Columbia's Yinka Dene (a completely different Carrier nation) in their opposition to Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline at the 41st Annual Dene National Assembly last week in Fort Providence, NWT.

"This resolution is an expression of our solidarity with the Yinka Dene Alliance, and an expression of our support for their right to have decision- making power over developments on their land," said Dene National Chief Bill Erasmus. "More than 50 per cent of the proposed Enbridge pipeline and tanker route passes through the territories of First Nations that have banned this development according to their traditional laws. These Nations now have the support of Dene from northern Alberta to the Arctic coast."

The proposed pipeline is also a direct concern for members of the Dene Nation and communities in Denendeh, the Northwest Territories, who are feeling the effects of tar sands expansion.

"We know this pipeline will enable further development of Alberta's destructive tar sands projects, which are contaminating the waters of Denendeh, and which are a growing source of greenhouse gas pollution responsible for the climate changes that are impacting our communities, cultures, and ways of life," Erasmus said. "We are also concerned about the potential for a spill from this pipeline, which would run through the headwaters of the Mackenzie River watershed. We are currently experiencing the impacts of an oil spill from Enbridge's Norman Wells pipeline in the Deh Cho region. The company failed to detect this estimated 63,000 gallon spill, which was ultimately discovered by Dene hunters."

"With over 100 pipeline spills and accidents recorded in Canada over the past two years there is only one thing to say about pipelines; they will spill," Erasmus said.

The Dene Nation is the national organization representing all Dene, from northern Alberta to the Gwich'in regions in northern Northwest Territories. The Dene Nation is mandated to retain sovereignty by strengthening the Dene spiritual beliefs and cultural values in Denendeh.

Contact Information:

Dene Nation Barret Lenoir Dene National Office (867) 873-4081

Dene Nation Daniel T'seleie Director, Lands & Environment (867) 444-0509 www.denenation.com