Media Advisory-Opposition to Northern Gateway Pipeline and Tanker Project Growing; Threatens Jobs and Environment

OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - March 12, 2012) - Attention News Editors When: Tuesday, March 13, 2012, 10 am

Where: Charles Lynch Media Studio, Room 130S, Centre Block, Parliament Buildings, Ottawa

Who: Chief Jackie Thomas, Saik'uz First Nation, Yinka Dene Alliance Arnie Nagy, United Fisherman's and Allied Workers' Union David Coles, President, Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada Michael Uehara, President, King Pacific Lodge Josh Paterson, Staff Lawyer, West Coast Environmental Law Rick Smith, Executive Director, Environmental Defence

What: First Nations, Unions and environmental groups come together to show growing opposition to Northern Gateway. Information will be provided on why the project is not in Canada's interest.

Contact Information: Gillian McEachern (613) 292-4416

Gitga'at Feast During Enbridge Pipeline Hearings B-Roll

High-resolution copy:http://www.filefactory.com/file/c35db1d/n/Gitgaat_Feast_B-Roll.m4v

B-roll footage from an incredible Gitga'at Nation feast held tonight in the Great Bear Rainforest during National Energy Board hearings in Hartley Bay. Includes opening ceremony (dancing and drumming), the Gitga'at tradition of burning a plate of food as an offering to those who have passed on, and footage of Gitga'at children and elders eating traditional foods, including salmon berries for desert!

This is a way of life we must all protect from the danger of an oil spill.

Enbridge Pipeline Hearings: Photos & Video

National Energy Board hearings into the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway oil tankers and pipeline project are taking place in Hartley Bay, Friday and Saturday, March 2nd and 3rd.

Photos and b-roll from Friday's hearings can be downloaded and are free to broadcast from the links below.

Photos (credit Sarah Stoner) available here.

High-Definition video clips::

Opening Ceremony featuring dancers and drumming

Prince Rupert Rally, Fly-in to Hartley Bay, Swearing In, Shots from Communal Dinner

Simone Reece explains living with the fear of an oil spill,  if pipeline was ever approved

Enbridge Pipeline: First Nation Says An Oil Spill Is Inevitable And Would Wipe-Out Their Food Supply and Way of Life

Gitga'at Nation tells National Energy Board it's not a question of if there will be an oil spill, but when.

HARTLEY BAY, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwire - March 2, 2012) - The Gitga'at Nation of Hartley Bay says an oil spill is inevitable if the Enbridge Northern Gateway oil tankers and pipeline project is ever approved, and would wipe out their food supply and way of life, which depends heavily on traditional foods from the ocean.

Hartley Bay is ground zero for the threat of an oil spill in BC's coastal waters. Located at the mouth of the Douglas Channel and the crossroads of the proposed North and South tanker routes, the community was the first on the scene when the Queen of the North ferry sank in 2006.

Diesel from the wreckage continues to pollute shellfish beds in the area, and many residents see it as a warning about tankers.

For their efforts saving passengers from the ferry, the Gitga'at received the Governor General's Commendation for Outstanding Service for "initiative, selflessness and an extraordinary commitment to the well-being of others."

40% of the Gitga'at diet is sourced directly from the ocean, and harvesting and sharing traditional food is at the core of who they are.

NEB hearings run Friday and Saturday, and interviews with Gitga'at Chiefs are available throughout the day.

Contact Information: Hartley Bay Band Council Ellen Torng, CEO 778-884-2559

Enbridge Hearings: First Nation Who Saved Passengers of Sinking Ferry Invites Public Into Their Homes

Gitga’at Nation to host three-day public open house during National Energy Board hearings as they defend the Northern way of life against the certain threat of an oil spill. HARTLEY BAY, BRITISH COLUMBIA (Feb. 29, 2012) – The Gitga’at Nation, who received a Governor General’s award for saving passengers of the Queen of the North ferry, is hosting a three-day open house and inviting the general public to join the nation in its opposition to the Enbridge oil tankers and pipeline project.

The Gitga’at have bought a half-page ad in a Prince Rupert newspaper, inviting the public to “feast and bear witness” March 1st, 2nd and 3rd, during National Energy Board hearings in the community.

To provide sleeping spaces and food, the Gitga’at are opening their homes and public buildings, and hosting several feasts and communal meals, free of charge.

“We invite you to experience traditional foods from the ocean and Gitga’at culture,” reads the ad. “The ocean is the tie that binds us, and an oil spill, when it comes, would undo that tie, and change coastal life as we know it, forever. It’s not a question of if there will be an oil spill, but when.”

40% or more of Gitga’at meals are sourced from the ocean, with foods like halibut, crab, salmon, prawns, mussels, clams, seaweed, oysters and herring. Feasts and potlaches are age-old traditions that reinforce the community’s sense of sharing and identity. An oil spill could wipe them out for good.

When the Queen of the North sank in 2006, the Gitga’at received the Governor General’s Commendation for Outstanding Service for “initiative, selflessness and an extraordinary commitment to the well-being of others.” Like the diesel fuel that still bubbles up from the ferry wreckage and pollutes their clam beds, it’s a memory that’s hard to forget.

It’s one that Canadians shouldn’t forget either.

To view Gitga’at submissions to the National Energy Board and written evidence about their traditional way of life, with an emphasis on food and social culture, visit: www.tinyurl.com/gitgaat

Contact Information: Gitga’at Nation 250-841-2500 hbvc@gitgaat.net

Canada's Environment Minister Dodges Question About "Enemies of the Government"

As the federal Conservative government continues its attack on the basic rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens (witness recent stories about voter-suppression and the controversial internet surveillance bill), we are freshly reminded of the anti-democratic and potentially illegal bullying this government is engaged in behind closed doors.

Yesterday, Peter Kent, Canada's Minister of the Environment, was asked a simple question by the Huffington Post editorial board that deserved a simple answer (view the full conversation here):

Q: Last month, troubling accusations were made that your government and the Prime Minister's Office have made backroom threats to remove the charitable status of environmental protection organizations in an attempt to stymie the voices of Canadians who oppose pipeline development from the Alberta oil sands. Do you agree that, if these accusations are true (as represented in Andrew Frank's affadavit from 23 January 2012), it is an affront to Canadian democracy and the processes that protect our nation's common interest?

Will you go on the record, stating that environmental protection and conservation groups are not enemies of the state, nor of the government of Canada, by virtue of their opposition to any development plan or industrial endeavour?

Here is Minister Kent's convoluted non-answer:

A: First of all I think we have to recognize there is no single category of environmental non-governmental agency (NGO). There is quite a range and the focus of their interest or opposition to resource projects, for example, is again a very broad range. There are some groups which would, as the Prime Minister said, reduce Canada to one great national park, with no resource development of any sort. There are others who are narrowly focused on one specific issue with regard to resource development. There are some who may have hidden agendas and some of the offshore, foreign funding, and we do have a concern about money coming from abroad that could represent rival resource interests disguised as environmental concern. In other words, to protect market or some other interest.

In question to those who say, "Why are you concerned about foreign money coming in from opponents to resource projects when you're not against money being spent by the resource companies themselves in promoting their engagement?" Well the resource companies are doing it as responsible guest corporate citizens. They're investing, they're paying taxes, they're paying royalties, they're being regulated... blah, blah, blah, read the whole non-answer here.

In his long-winded non-answer, Minister Kent managed to completely dodge the original question, and even managed to answer a question that hadn't been asked.

Whether you are concerned about the environment or not, I think all Canadians can agree that a government has lost the moral authority to govern when it starts labeling its own citizens "enemies."

Add that to your lists of reasons to vote ABC (Anything But Conservative) in the next federal election.

Federal Government's Environmental Assessment Agenda Risks Public Health and Safety, Invites Environmental Disaster

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwire - Feb. 20, 2012) - Leading public health physicians, environmental lawyers and academics warned today against haphazard federal attempts to undermine environmental reviews for projects like Enbridge's controversial Northern Gateway oil tanker and pipeline plan, cautioning that any government effort to cut corners will put public health and safety at risk. To evaluate any federal plan to alter environmental reviews, the groups have published a checklist of ten foundational elements that any strong environmental assessment law needs in order to deliver on core Canadian values related to the environment, democracy, and safe and responsible development.

"We can't afford to get these decisions wrong - the whole point of environmental assessment is to protect Canadians and their environment from danger," says Gideon Forman, Executive Director of Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment. "For example, medical studies have shown there are acute health effects from oil spills, and real questions about the implications for long-term health. Weakening environmental reviews might be good for oil companies, but it's not good for the health and safety of Canadian families."

Forman cited a range of studies on the human health effects of oil spills available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/oilspillresponse/studies.html.

The federal government has indicated its intention to further weaken environmental legislation, possibly including the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA), a fundamental law linked to almost 50 other pieces of legislation, including those that protect endangered species and national parks, in order to push through oil pipelines and industrial megaprojects. Of particular concern to the authors of the report is the government's declared wish to dramatically reduce citizens' rights to participate in environmental reviews for major natural resource developments like the Enbridge oil tanker and pipeline project.

"Canadians want strong environmental laws, not a return to bygone days when we rushed projects through no matter what," said Rachel Forbes, a lawyer with West Coast Environmental Law. "We had a century of giving the environment short shrift, where the public and Aboriginal nations had no input at all. That resulted in bad decisions that in many cases have left communities and the environment scarred in ways that could have been avoided. Our checklist provides a guide as to how we can create effective environmental assessment laws and ensure that the best possible decisions are made for communities, the economy and the environment."

Forbes pointed to examples of major hydro dams built in the mid-twentieth century, like BC's Bennett Dam and Manitoba's Churchill River diversion, where there was little if any environmental review, some communities had only days notice that they would be flooded out, and entire river systems were permanently damaged. "It would be a mistake to turn the clock back," she added.

"Experience has shown us that local knowledge and public involvement leads to better long term decision-making," said Jamie Kneen, Communications and Outreach Coordinator at MiningWatch Canada. "We believe there are efficiencies to be had in doing environmental assessment right, but public participation is critical to identifying projects that make the greatest contribution to a sustainable economy, and putting them in the right place."

The Checklist for Strong Environmental Laws is authored by West Coast Environmental Law, Ecovision Law, MiningWatch Canada, and Dr. John Sinclair, an independent professor at the University of Manitoba's Natural Resources Institute, and may be found at:http://wcel.org/resources/publication/checklist-for-strong-environmental-laws.

Contact Information:

West Coast Environmental Law Rachel S. Forbes Staff Lawyer 604.601.2508 or 604.345.9129 (cell) rachel_forbes@wcel.org www.wcel.org

Ecovision Law Stephen Hazell Environmental Lawyer, Ecovision Law and Law Professor 613.422.1107 or 613.724.1908 (cell) stephendhazell@gmail.com

MiningWatch Canada Jamie Kneen - Communications and Outreach Coordinator Co-Chair, Environmental Planning and Assessment Caucus of the Canadian Environment Network 613.569.3439 or 613.761.2273 (cell) jamie@miningwatch.ca

You Can’t Eat Oil

For the Gitga’at, it’s not a question of if there will be an oil spill, but when.

(PHOTO CREDITS: Kate Turner)

VANCOUVER, BC, Feb. 19, 2012/ Troy Media/ - Imagine you’re grocery shopping with your family and you get to the store only to find that it’s closed. It’s almost dinnertime, so you try another one down the street. It’s closed too. You turn on your car radio and the newscaster announces that all the grocery stores in a 700-kilometre radius are closed, permanently.

What would you do?

That’s the question the Gitga’at First Nation of Hartley Bay, British Columbia are asking themselves about the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway oil tanker and pipeline project. Their community lies at the mouth of the Douglas Channel, the narrow channel that super tankers would navigate on their way to Kitimat, to load up with oil sands crude, bound for China. An oil spill in their territory would close their grocery store – the ocean – for hundreds if not thousands of kilometres.

It’s about food, not oil

Earlier this month, I was lucky enough to visit Prince Rupert and witness the two-thousand citizen march against the Enbridge pipeline organized by the Gitga’at. These weren’t latte-sipping environmentalists; the marchers were fisherman, traditional harvesters, First Nations and soccer moms. Native and non-native, they were there to defend Canada’s Pacific coastal economy, and their way of life.

While I was visiting, I ate dinner at a local seafood restaurant, and I ordered a meal that included halibut, crab, salmon, prawns, mussels and clams. The chef and waitress were both First Nations, and they explained to me the importance of seafood and cultural practices like feasts. My Visa was maxed out and so was my stomach. I wish I could eat like that every night.

For the Gitga’at, that’s not a fancy dinner, that’s food on the table. Forty per cent (or more) of Gitga’at meals are traditionally sourced from country foods like the ones I was eating, as well as seaweed, oysters, herring, sea cucumber and harbour seal, often harvested in traditional harvesting camps. That’s according to socio-cultural studies filed by the Gitga’at with the National Energy Board’s Joint Review Panel, currently considering the Enbridge pipeline.

Harvesting and sharing traditional food is what defines the Gitga’at people. Feasts and potlatches were age-old traditions that reinforced the community’s sense of sharing and social identity, but they were banned by the government from 1885 to 1951. Like the residential schools, the ban was a deliberate attempt to kill First Nations culture. Fortunately, the traditions were kept alive. However, an oil spill near Hartley Bay, could wipe them out for good.

Who will rescue the rescuers?

When the BC Ferry Queen of the North sank in 2006, the Gitga’at were the first on the scene, saving passengers from the sinking ship and feeding them and keeping them warm in their community hall, which was transformed into a rescue centre. For their efforts, the Gitga’at received the Governor General’s Commendation for Outstanding Service, for “initiative, selflessness and an extraordinary commitment to the well-being of others.” Like the diesel fuel that still bubbles up from the ferry wreckage and pollutes their shellfish beds, forcing families to seek other harvesting grounds, it’s a memory that’s hard to forget.

It’s one that Canadians shouldn’t forget either.

For the Gitga’at, it’s not a question of if there will be an oil spill, but when, a contention supported by Enbridge’s refusal to guarantee there won’t be a spill.

Listening to the marine radio doesn’t inspire confidence. Foreign captains make navigational mistakes and confusion is common. Sometimes the marine pilots have to ask visiting ships if there is anyone on board who speaks English. Throw in unpredictable weather and legendary storms, and it’s easy to understand why there have been multiple sinkings and even more close calls over the years.

The Gitga’at are fishing people, but they’re also business people, developing their own hydropower project, eco-tourism and bear-viewing operations, and a partnership with a local luxury fishing lodge in the Great Bear Rainforest. They have more than 17 businesses producing millions of dollars in revenue. They are also involved in conservation efforts through their Guardian Watchmen program, one of the largest on the coast, monitoring and protecting the health of their ocean environment. Life should be good, but instead it’s stressful.

If the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline were ever approved, the traditional feasts and potlatches of the Gitga’at would take place in the permanent shadow of the threat of an oil spill. The grocery stores could be closed at any time.

Protecting the cultural vitality of the Gitga’at people is far more in Canada’s national interest than piping billions of barrels of unrefined oil to China. When the Queen of the North sank, the Gitga’at protected the well-being of total strangers. Now it’s our turn as Canadians and fellow citizens, to return the favour, by saying “no” to the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway oil tanker and pipeline project.

There are better ways to serve the national interest. This pipeline is not one of them.

Andrew Frank is a citizen. He is also an instructor in the Environmental Protection Technology program at Kwantlen Polytechnic University in Surrey, British Columbia, and a communication specialist. To find out more, visit www.andrewfrank.ca

This column is FREE to use on your websites or in your publications. However, Troy Media, with a link to its web site, MUST be credited.